image

What is behind Antonio Conte’s latest rift at Napoli

Based on reports, including those referencing the original piece by CalcioNapoli24 on the “Conte case,” the rift involving Antonio Conte and the Napoli squad originated primarily after the humiliating 6-2 defeat against PSV Eindhoven in the Champions League.

The core of the problem, and what led to the internal tensions, stems from:

 

1. The Post-Eindhoven Confrontation

 

Immediately following the heavy defeat in the dressing room, the team experienced a “very agitated and intense confrontation.” The key element reported is that this confrontation was “voluto dai calciatori” (wanted by the players) themselves. The players reportedly initiated the clear-the-air meeting to address the alarming breakdown of team unity and tactical structure.

 

2. Conte’s Public Blame on New Signings

 

In his post-match press conference, Antonio Conte publicly stated what he believed was the root cause of the team’s struggles: “Troppi giocatori nuovi” (too many new players). He specifically mentioned that bringing in nine new players was “troppi” (too many) for a stable team, making the season “complex.” This statement was seen as a key trigger for the rift.

 

3. “Communication Problems” and Tactical Breakdown

 

The underlying issues were described as “problemi di comunicazione” (communication problems) within the squad. The defeat against PSV exposed a complete tactical breakdown, with the team appearing fragile, lacking grit, and having lost their defensive solidity. Conte himself noted that the club had lost the “alchimia” (alchemy) and the “spirito” (spirit) of the previous season’s Scudetto-winning squad, which had been characterized by extreme “compattezza” (compactness).

In essence, the tension escalated because the team’s massive defeat led to a player-initiated confrontation, followed by the coach publicly blaming the sheer number of new arrivals for the instability, leading to questions about the management of the squad and communication within the locker room.

 

 

 

Comment / Reply From